<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What We Know About the Bible that Ain’t So – 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://richardekelly.com/blog/what-we-know-about-the-bible-3/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://richardekelly.com/blog/what-we-know-about-the-bible-3</link>
	<description>Encourage those who are seeking the truth; question those who find it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 12:28:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom sheepandgoats</title>
		<link>http://richardekelly.com/blog/what-we-know-about-the-bible-3/comment-page-1#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>tom sheepandgoats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 13:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardekelly.com/blog/?p=229#comment-176</guid>
		<description>The last 12 verses of Mark and the ‘adultery’ verses of John are spurious. How do you know that? Is it not because Bible manuscripts were widely circulated (for evangelizing purposes) and a comparison of the thousands that have been found makes it possible to spot just what is spurious, also where and when it was introduced? The King James Version, 400 years old, runs these verses without commentary, but translations of the last few decades typically highlight or footnote them in some way to alert the reader. Certainly the New World Translation does so. Moreover, while the Watchtower magazine appeals to the scriptures to make any number of points, they never refer to the verses you’ve mentioned, unless it is to point out they are spurious.

Would that errors in other ancient writings were so easy to spot and rectify.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last 12 verses of Mark and the ‘adultery’ verses of John are spurious. How do you know that? Is it not because Bible manuscripts were widely circulated (for evangelizing purposes) and a comparison of the thousands that have been found makes it possible to spot just what is spurious, also where and when it was introduced? The King James Version, 400 years old, runs these verses without commentary, but translations of the last few decades typically highlight or footnote them in some way to alert the reader. Certainly the New World Translation does so. Moreover, while the Watchtower magazine appeals to the scriptures to make any number of points, they never refer to the verses you’ve mentioned, unless it is to point out they are spurious.</p>
<p>Would that errors in other ancient writings were so easy to spot and rectify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  richardekelly.com/blog/what-we-know-about-the-bible-3/feed ) in 0.38764 seconds, on May 21st, 2012 at 9:14 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 21st, 2012 at 10:14 pm UTC -->
